MLLSE RX 5700 XT stands as a powerful mid-range graphics card delivering impressive performance for 1440p gaming with competitive pricing.
In this review, we will analyze all aspects of the MLLSE RX 5700 XT in terms of performance, specifications, and various uses.
✅ You can buy MLLSE RX 5700 XT from Aliexpress buy following this Link.
What is MLLSE RX 5700 XT?
MLLSE AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT represents one of AMD’s most significant GPU releases in recent years. As the flagship product of AMD’s first-generation RDNA architecture (codenamed Navi), this graphics card marked an important shift in AMD’s approach to GPU design. Released initially in July 2019, the RX 5700 XT was positioned as a strong competitor in the mid-to-high-end GPU market, targeting gamers seeking excellent 1440p performance without breaking the bank.
What makes this card particularly interesting is how it signaled AMD’s renewed commitment to competing in the performance segment. The RX 5700 XT introduced several architectural improvements over the previous GCN (Graphics Core Next) design, resulting in better performance-per-watt and performance-per-dollar metrics than we had previously seen from AMD products.
As we look at this card from our 2025 perspective, I find it fascinating to evaluate how well this GPU has aged compared to newer options. Has it maintained its value proposition over time? Can it still handle modern gaming demands? These questions become particularly relevant when considering whether this card represents a viable option in today’s market, especially for budget-conscious buyers seeking used hardware. 🤔
Read also: MLLSE RX 580 Review: Still Worth Buying in 2025?
Technical Specifications of MLLSE RX 5700 XT
Stream Processors
MLLSE RX 5700 XT comes equipped with 2,560 stream processors (AMD’s equivalent to NVIDIA’s CUDA cores) arranged in 40 Compute Units (CUs). This represents a significant computational resource that enables the card to handle complex graphical workloads efficiently. These stream processors form the foundation of the card’s rendering capabilities, handling everything from basic geometry calculations to complex shader operations.
What makes these stream processors particularly interesting is that they’re built on the RDNA architecture, which offers approximately 25% better performance-per-clock compared to AMD’s previous GCN architecture. This architectural improvement means each stream processor delivers more effective performance than raw numbers might suggest when compared to older AMD cards.
Base & Boost Clock Speeds
| Clock Type | Speed |
|---|---|
| Base Clock | 1,605 MHz |
| Game Clock | 1,755 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1,905 MHz |
AMD introduced a new “Game Clock” metric with the RX 5700 series, representing the expected sustained clock speed during typical gaming scenarios. The boost clock of 1,905 MHz represents the maximum frequency the card can reach under ideal conditions, though actual sustained performance might vary based on thermal and power constraints.
These clock speeds were quite competitive for the time of release, and even by 2025 standards, they remain respectable. The significant gap between base and boost clocks gives the card flexibility to maintain performance while managing thermals, a balancing act that becomes particularly important during extended gaming sessions.
VRAM Type and Capacity
RX 5700 XT features 8GB of GDDR6 memory, which was the standard high-performance memory type when the card launched. GDDR6 offered a significant bandwidth improvement over the previous GDDR5 standard, enabling faster texture loading and better performance at higher resolutions.
While 8GB of VRAM was generous in 2019, in 2025 this amount has become more of a baseline for mid-range cards. However, it remains sufficient for most 1440p gaming scenarios, though some of the most demanding titles with ultra-high texture settings might push against this limit.
Memory Bus & Bandwidth
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory Bus Width | 256-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
With its 256-bit memory bus and high-speed GDDR6 memory running at 14 Gbps, the RX 5700 XT achieves a total memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s. This substantial bandwidth allows the GPU to quickly access texture and asset data, reducing potential bottlenecks when rendering complex scenes.
This memory configuration remains quite respectable even in 2025, offering enough throughput for smooth 1440p gaming in most titles. The balanced combination of memory capacity and bandwidth has contributed significantly to the card’s longevity in the market.
TDP and Power Consumption
MLLSE RX 5700 XT has a rated TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 225W, which was somewhat high for its performance class at launch. This power draw reflects the first-generation nature of the RDNA architecture, which hadn’t yet achieved the efficiency improvements we’d see in later iterations.
In practical terms, this power consumption means the card requires robust cooling solutions and a quality power supply. Most partner models feature substantial heatsinks and dual or triple fan configurations to manage the heat output effectively. From a power supply perspective, AMD officially recommends a 600W PSU or greater for systems built around this GPU.
Read also: MLLSE RTX 3060 Review: Still Worth Buying in 2025?
Performance Benchmarks
Synthetic Benchmarks (3DMark, Unigine Heaven)
| Benchmark | Score | Comparison |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 8,900 | Comparable to RTX 2070 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 22,400 | Slightly above GTX 1080 |
| Unigine Heaven | 2,650 | Between RTX 2060 Super and 2070 |
In synthetic benchmarks, the RX 5700 XT continues to hold its ground admirably, especially considering its age. In 3DMark Time Spy, it delivers performance roughly equivalent to NVIDIA’s RTX 2070, which positioned it firmly in the upper-mid-range segment at launch.
What’s particularly impressive is how well these results have aged. Even in 2025, these scores represent decent performance, though obviously falling behind the current generation offerings. For users who care about raw performance metrics, these numbers suggest the RX 5700 XT remains a capable card for many workloads.
1080p, 1440p, and 4K Gaming Performance
| Resolution | Average FPS in Modern Titles | Experience |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 120-160 FPS | Excellent Performance |
| 1440p | 80-110 FPS | Very Good Performance |
| 4K | 40-60 FPS | Playable with Some Settings Adjustments |
The RX 5700 XT truly shines at 1080p resolution, where it delivers high frame rates even in demanding modern titles. At this resolution, most games run well above 100 FPS with high or even ultra settings, providing an excellent experience for high-refresh-rate gaming monitors.
At 1440p, which I consider this card’s sweet spot, performance remains very good. Most titles run comfortably between 80-110 FPS with high settings, offering a smooth experience that balances visual quality and performance. Even some of the more demanding titles released up to 2025 remain quite playable at this resolution, though you might need to reduce some settings from ultra to high.
4K gaming is where the limitations of this card become more apparent. While less demanding or well-optimized titles can reach 60 FPS, many modern AAA games will require significant settings reductions to maintain smooth gameplay. The 8GB VRAM buffer also becomes a potential limiting factor at this resolution with high-texture settings.
Ray Tracing and DLSS / FSR Performance
| Feature | Support | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Ray Tracing | No Hardware Acceleration | Poor |
| FSR 1.0 | Supported | Good |
| FSR 2.0/2.1 | Supported | Very Good |
| FSR 3.0 | Limited Support | Moderate |
Unlike NVIDIA’s RTX cards of the same generation, the RX 5700 XT lacks dedicated ray tracing hardware. This means that while it can technically run ray-traced effects through software implementation, the performance hit is substantial, often reducing frame rates by 50-70%.
However, AMD’s FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution) technology has somewhat extended the useful life of this card. FSR 1.0 and particularly FSR 2.0/2.1 provide meaningful performance boosts when enabled. The newer FSR 3.0 offers some benefits but with more limited compatibility on this older hardware.
It’s worth noting that while DLSS remains exclusive to NVIDIA cards, FSR works across vendors and has seen widespread adoption, benefiting RX 5700 XT owners significantly as developers have embraced the technology.
Productivity and Content Creation Performance
| Workload | Performance | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Video Editing | Good | Capable of 4K timeline editing with some optimizations |
| 3D Rendering | Moderate | Shows its age in complex scenes |
| Photoshop/Illustrator | Very Good | Handles large files with minimal lag |
| Blender (OpenCL) | Acceptable | Newer cards offer significant improvements |
Beyond gaming, the RX 5700 XT offers respectable performance for content creation tasks. Video editing software like Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve can leverage the card’s capabilities effectively, though more complex effects and higher resolution projects will show its limitations compared to newer options.
For 3D rendering, the card is showing its age more evidently. While it can handle moderate workloads in applications like Blender using OpenCL, it lacks the specialized hardware acceleration features found in newer cards, resulting in longer render times for complex projects.
Adobe’s creative suite runs quite well on this GPU, with Photoshop and Illustrator remaining responsive even when working with large, multi-layered files. Effects that leverage GPU acceleration see particular benefit from the card’s computational resources.
Cooling System & Temperature Management
Thermal Performance Under Load
| Test Condition | Reference Model | Partner Models (Average) |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Temperature | 45°C | 38°C |
| Gaming Load | 89°C | 75°C |
| Stress Test | 95°C | 82°C |
| Junction Temperature | Up to 110°C | Up to 95°C |
The reference design of the RX 5700 XT (AMD’s own blower-style cooler) was notorious for its high temperatures and noise levels. Under gaming loads, junction temperatures could reach up to 110°C, though AMD insisted this was within design specifications.
Partner models with custom cooling solutions fare significantly better, typically running 10-15°C cooler under load. Cards from manufacturers like Sapphire, PowerColor, and MSI implemented dual or triple-fan designs with substantial heatsinks, dramatically improving thermal performance.
The “hotspot” or junction temperature was a particular concern with this GPU generation. These localized high-temperature areas required careful cooling consideration, and better thermal paste application can make a notable difference in used cards that have been in service for several years.
Fan Noise Levels
| Card Model | Idle Noise | Load Noise |
|---|---|---|
| Reference (Blower) | 35 dBA | 43 dBA |
| Dual-Fan Designs | 30 dBA | 38 dBA |
| Triple-Fan Designs | 28 dBA | 36 dBA |
Noise levels vary significantly between the reference blower design and partner cards. AMD’s reference cooler was among the loudest of its generation, producing a distinctive and often distracting whine under load.
Partner cards generally offer much better acoustic performance. Triple-fan designs from manufacturers like Sapphire (Nitro+) and PowerColor (Red Devil) are particularly impressive, maintaining reasonable noise levels even under sustained load. Most custom-cooled 5700 XTs remain audible under full load but avoid becoming the dominant noise source in a typical gaming setup.
Overclocking Potential
| Parameter | Typical Overclocking Headroom |
|---|---|
| Core Clock | +100-150 MHz |
| Memory Clock | +100-200 MHz |
| Power Limit | +20-30% |
| Resulting Performance Gain | 5-10% |
The RX 5700 XT offers moderate overclocking potential, though results vary significantly between individual cards due to silicon lottery factors. Most cards can achieve stable core clock increases of 100-150 MHz over stock settings, with memory overclocks typically in the 100-200 MHz range.
Power limits can usually be increased by 20-30%, though this comes with corresponding increases in heat output and power consumption. The resulting performance improvements typically fall in the 5-10% range – noticeable, but not transformative.
It’s worth noting that the first-generation RDNA architecture tends to run into thermal limitations before hitting its true performance ceiling, making cooling quality a significant factor in overclocking success. Partner cards with robust cooling solutions generally offer better overclocking potential than the reference design.
Comparison MLLSE RX 5700 XT with Competing GPUs
Comparison with Previous Generation Cards
| Specification | RX 5700 XT | RX Vega 64 | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | RDNA (7nm) | GCN (14nm) | Major architecture shift |
| Stream Processors | 2,560 | 4,096 | Fewer but more efficient |
| Game Performance | 100% (baseline) | 85-90% | ~10-15% faster |
| Power Consumption | 225W | 295W | ~24% more efficient |
| Temperature | Hot (75-85°C) | Very Hot (85-95°C) | Improved but still warm |
MLLSE RX 5700 XT represented a significant step forward from AMD’s previous flagship, the Vega 64. Despite having fewer stream processors on paper, the architectural improvements of RDNA made each compute unit substantially more efficient. The result was a card that delivered better gaming performance while consuming significantly less power – a double win that highlighted the architectural advances.
What’s particularly striking is the efficiency improvement. Moving from 14nm to 7nm manufacturing process, combined with the new architecture, allowed AMD to reduce power consumption by approximately 24% while increasing performance. This step forward in performance-per-watt was perhaps the most important advancement, signaling AMD’s renewed competitiveness in the GPU market.
Temperature management also improved, though the 5700 XT still ran relatively hot compared to contemporary NVIDIA offerings. This thermal profile would become a common theme for AMD cards of this generation.
Comparison with AMD/NVIDIA Alternatives
| GPU Model | Relative Gaming Performance | Price at Launch | Price-to-Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| RX 5700 XT | 100% (baseline) | $399 | 100% (baseline) |
| RTX 2060 Super | 90-95% | $399 | 90-95% |
| RTX 2070 | 95-100% | $499 | 75-80% |
| RTX 2070 Super | 110-115% | $499 | 88-92% |
| RX 5700 | 90-95% | $349 | 108-110% |
Against NVIDIA’s competing products, the RX 5700 XT positioned itself as a direct competitor to the RTX 2060 Super and original RTX 2070. In raw rasterization performance (traditional rendering without ray tracing), the 5700 XT typically matched or slightly exceeded these competitors, offering excellent value at its $399 launch price.
However, NVIDIA’s RTX cards held significant advantages in two key areas: ray tracing capability and DLSS support. While ray tracing was still in its early adoption phase in 2019, by 2025 these features have become much more prevalent in modern games, widening the functional gap between these generations.
Compared to AMD’s own product stack, the standard RX 5700 (non-XT) offered nearly the same performance (within 5-10%) at a $50 lower price point, making it arguably the better value proposition for budget-conscious consumers.
Power Efficiency & PSU Requirements
The RX 5700 XT draws a significant amount of power, with a rated TDP of 225W. This places it among the more power-hungry cards of its performance class, especially compared to some of NVIDIA’s offerings at the time. In practical terms, this power consumption manifests in several important considerations:
| Power Supply Requirement | Minimum Recommended | Recommended for Overclocking |
|---|---|---|
| System Power Supply | 600W | 750W |
| PCIe Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin |
| Typical Gaming Power Draw | 180-220W | 200-250W |
| Peak Power Spikes | Up to 300W | Up to 350W |
Power delivery to the card occurs through one 8-pin and one 6-pin PCIe power connector, providing sufficient headroom for the card’s needs, including modest overclocking. Most quality 600W power supplies can handle the RX 5700 XT without issues, though systems with high-end CPUs or extensive peripherals might benefit from a 750W unit for additional headroom.
What’s particularly interesting about the RX 5700 XT’s power profile is how it compares to AMD’s previous generation. Despite offering better performance than the Vega 64, it consumes approximately 70W less power under load – a testament to the efficiency improvements brought by the RDNA architecture and 7nm manufacturing process.
For those considering using this card in 2025, it’s worth noting that power efficiency standards have continued to improve. Modern cards offering similar performance might draw significantly less power, potentially making the RX 5700 XT less appealing for energy-conscious users or those in regions with high electricity costs.
Best Use Cases: Gaming, Editing, AI, etc.
MLLSE RX 5700 XT excels in specific use cases while showing limitations in others. Understanding these strengths and weaknesses helps determine whether this card remains a viable option in 2025:
| Use Case | Suitability | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p Gaming | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Excellent performance, high frame rates |
| 1440p Gaming | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Very good performance in most titles |
| 4K Gaming | ⭐⭐⭐ | Playable but requires settings compromises |
| Competitive Gaming | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | High frame rates at 1080p |
| Video Editing | ⭐⭐⭐ | Capable but newer cards offer better acceleration |
| 3D Rendering | ⭐⭐ | Functional but not ideal for complex projects |
| Machine Learning | ⭐⭐ | Limited by VRAM and lack of specialized hardware |
| VR Gaming | ⭐⭐⭐ | Meets minimum requirements but not ideal |
For gaming at 1080p resolution, RX 5700 XT remains an excellent performer in 2025. Most titles, including relatively recent releases, run smoothly at high or ultra settings with frame rates often exceeding 100 FPS. This makes it particularly well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors at 1080p resolution.
At 1440p, the card continues to deliver very good performance. Most games run comfortably above 60 FPS with high settings, though the newest and most demanding titles might require some settings adjustments to maintain smooth framerates.
Content creation workloads show the card’s age more clearly. While basic video editing and rendering tasks perform adequately, professionals working with complex projects will notice significant performance advantages with newer hardware that offers better hardware acceleration for popular applications.
Machine learning and AI workloads are perhaps the weakest area for this card. The limited VRAM (compared to modern standards) and lack of specialized hardware acceleration for these tasks make it suboptimal for serious AI development or research.
Pricing & Value for Money
The RX 5700 XT launched at an MSRP of $399 in July 2019, positioning it as a mid-to-high-end offering at that time. In the years since, its market value has fluctuated significantly, affected by factors including new product launches, cryptocurrency mining trends, and global supply chain challenges.
| Time Period | Typical Market Price | Value Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Launch (July 2019) | $399 (MSRP) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Mining Boom (2020-2021) | $700-1,000+ | ⭐ |
| Post-Mining (2022-2023) | $250-350 | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Current (2025) | $200-230 (Used) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
In 2025, used RX 5700 XT cards typically sell for between $120-180, depending on the specific model, condition, and remaining warranty. At this price point, the card represents excellent value for certain use cases, particularly for gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p resolutions who are working with tight budgets.
When considering value, it’s important to factor in the card’s power consumption. The relatively high power draw compared to newer, more efficient designs means higher electricity costs over time – something budget-conscious buyers should consider, especially if they plan to use the card extensively.
For current-generation alternatives, cards like the hypothetical RX 7600 or RTX 5060 (based on naming conventions) would offer similar or better performance with significantly improved features and lower power consumption, but at higher initial purchase prices in the $250-350 range. This price gap makes the used 5700 XT an attractive option for pure performance-per-dollar if newer features aren’t essential.
Pros and Cons of MLLSE RX 5700 XT
Is MLLSE RX 5700 XT Worth Buying in 2025?
As we consider MLLSE RX 5700 XT from our 2025 perspective, the question of value becomes nuanced and dependent on individual needs. For certain users, this card remains a compelling option despite its age.
For budget-conscious gamers focused primarily on 1080p or 1440p gaming without ray tracing requirements, the used RX 5700 XT represents excellent value. At typical used prices of $200-230, few current-generation cards can match its raw performance-per-dollar ratio. This makes it particularly attractive for budget gaming builds or as a stopgap upgrade while saving for a more substantial future investment.
Content creators on tight budgets might also find the card acceptable for lighter workloads, though the benefits of newer hardware become more apparent in professional applications. The lack of AV1 codec support and limited acceleration for modern creative apps are notable limitations for this use case.
Ultimately, MLLSE RX 5700 XT occupies an interesting position in 2025 – no longer cutting-edge but still competent enough for many common workloads at an attractive price point. For users with appropriate expectations and specific needs, it remains a viable option worth considering.
✅ You can buy MLLSE RX 5700 XT from Aliexpress buy following this Link.
FAQs About AMD RX 5700 XT
A: A quality 600W power supply is the minimum recommendation for systems using the MLLSE 5700 XT. For systems with high-end CPUs or for those planning to overclock, a 700-750W unit provides better headroom.
A: AMD’s FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) technology renders games at a lower resolution and then upscales them, improving performance without significantly compromising visual quality. For the RX 5700 XT, FSR 2.0/2.1 can provide significant frame rate boosts in supported titles, extending the card’s effective lifespan for modern gaming.
